Cameras

Ebony RW45 fully extended with Fujinon-C 450mm and extension tube (click for larger image)

 


Canon EOS 5D (click for larger image)
—replaced with 5D Mark II

 


Canon EOS 350D/Rebel XT (click for larger image)

 


Canon PowerShot S80 (click for larger image)

 

4x5 Gear

Camera
Ebony RW45


This camera may look old, but it's actually a 2005 model made of mahogany and titanium that is handmade in Japan. The RW45 is Ebony's entry level 4x5 camera which is among the lightest field cameras weighing in at just 3.6 pounds. Ebony makes the highest quality wooden field cameras out today. The basic technology it utilizes in exposing film is over a hundred years old, and is certainly much slower than any other type of camera format, but the size of the film, which is just under 4x5", is the main attraction. Starting out with a size of film that big allows for much larger prints which holds much more detail, sharpness and tonality than something along the lines of 35mm film, or even top-end digital SLRs out today, since you don't have to stretch it out as much. To illustrate, a 40x50" print from a 4x5" piece of film is roughly equivalent to an 11x14" print from 35mm film! And, 11x14s from 35mm look pretty darn good! It is for this reason that I try to capture most scenes using this camera, though sometimes it just isn't the right tool, such as if there is a stiff wind or you just arrive at a place and the light is doing its thing. And, in case you're wondering how much it costs per one picture (and I'm sure you are!), it's about $3.65 — that's $1.90 to buy the film, and $1.75 for processing.

 

Lenses
Schneider Super-Symmar 80 XL f/4.5 and 3b center filter
Schneider Super-Symmar 110 XL f/5.6

Nikkor W 150mm 5.6
Rodenstock 210mm 5.6 Apo-Sironar-N
Nikkor M 300 f/9
Fujinon-C 450 f/12.5

Other
Harrison changing tent
Fuji QuickLoad holders

BTZS dark cloth
Toyo 3.6 loupe
Sekonic L-508 light meter

Half-darkslide for 2x5" panoramas

Film
Fuji Provia 100F
This was the first slide film I started with and used from September of 2000 through August of 2003. It returned as my preference and main film used starting in August, 2007. I feel it has the most natural color palette of any of the Fuji slide films which lies in between either extreme of Velvia and Astia. My tastes in color saturation have matured and mellowed, and I think I'm finally back at the right place.

Fuji Velvia 100
This was thought to be originally intended to be the replacement for Velvia 50, but turned out to not be the case. It has a slightly cooler color palette than Velvia 50, but finer grain, and of course, an extra stop of speed. It was my primary film I used between September 2005 through July of 2007. I have mostly discontinued its use for the same reasons I list below for Velvia 50. However, I still employ it for some overcast scenes where it still shines.

Fuji Velvia 50
The industry standard for landscape photography since it was introduced in 1990. Super saturated colors and fine grain. It has a narrow exposure latitude which is less forgiving than other slide films in high contrast scenes. The main aspects I don't like about it is the gaudy purple colors it produces during certain warm situations along with an overly electric blue skies in other situations. The latter which can be desaturated and controlled easier in digital post-processing than the former. It was the primary film I used between September 2003 and September 2005.

Fuji Astia 100F
The finest grain film on the market provides the most true to life colors, though it has a distinct green cast. It has the highest dynamic range of Fuji's slide film, but this means it is super dull and unimpressive to look at on a light box, for most situations anyway. It is extremely muted on the warm colors such as the reds and oranges of sunrise and sunset. Starting in January, 2007, it was my intent to switch to this as my primary film. My original plan was to process these in Photoshop and treat them just like I would a raw digital file and bring it back to life. I mostly shot Velvia 100 side-by-side through August, 2007, but felt Astia was at too much the other extreme as Velvia, the latter which I still preferred. Ultimately, I wanted something in between. Enter Provia.

DSLR gear

Cameras

Canon 5D Mark II (21.1 megapixels)
I wasn't initially planning to get the 5D replacement, and I went back and forth a few times, but in the end, the HD video option was too compelling. I was more than content with the image quality of the original, and the additional megapixels don't make this camera twice as good, but it does have some other welcome features like a much better LCD, an in-camera dust removal feature, and higher ISO availability that I've already put to use shooting the Milky Way.

Canon 5D (12.7 megapixels)
This 35mm-sensor camera provides the the image quality I desire when using the 4x5 camera isn't the best tool for the job as this is the next best thing. It allows for generous enlargements with great detail and full image control that a raw digital file possesses. This now serves as my backup camera.


Canon 350D/Rebel XT (8 megapixels)
The Canon Rebel XT was my first digital SLR camera and now serves as my capable backup and wildlife camera. Though it used to be Canon's entry level SLR, it is a very capable little machine that can make wonderful 20x30" prints, and sometimes larger. It is extremely small and lightweight, which is a landscape photographer's dream. The smaller, 15x22mm sensor packs almost twice the pixels in the same image area as the 5D, which is why this is vastly superior for critters that would only fill its image area, such as birds or distant wildlife.

Lenses
Nikon 14-24 f/2.8 ED

Canon 24-105 f/4L IS
Canon 70-200 f/4L IS
Canon 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS

Canon 500 f/4L IS
Canon 1.4 Extender II
Canon 2x Extender II

Filters
Tiffen Polarizer
Singh Ray 2-stop soft and 3-stop hard graduated neutral density

 

 

Digital point-and-shoot

Canon PowerShot S80 (8 megapixel)

The S80 is actually my workhorse, believe it or not. This camera, which I upgraded from the 4-megapixel S45, really gets a workout as I take far more pictures with it compared to any of my other cameras combined, and I really love this thing! Point-and-shoots are perfect for those journal-type shots that you can just fire away which help to tell a visual story in my travels. But wouldn't you know, it is too often the case where I take a snapshot using this camera that I don't take the time to shoot with a different one, then when I get back home I'm kicking myself that I wish I had because the scene actually looks better than I thought it did! This was the main reason I upgraded to the S80, so it could offer a bit better quality of enlargement over the S45. Well, the large 2.5" LCD is super nice, too! I also use it to record any voice notes, and it can record up to a minute of audio on a related picture, which is longer than any other camera brand I've come across. I used this feature extensively on my 2005 Canadian trip with the S45. The only negative aspect this camera has is the lack of raw file support, which allows for greater flexibility in post-processing. This is actually not a concern for me anyway as I would always opt for JPEGs with this camera format, and if it's a picture worth taking, I always use a more capable camera anyway. The zoom range on this is a 35mm equivalent of 28-110mm, so it is great on the wide end and works perfect for most scenes. It also has a rapid start-up and shut-down sequence that is as fast as I've seen in a point-and-shoot.


Other

Tripod umbrella (Sand-n-Sun beach chair, clamp-style umbrella found at Wal-Mart—$5.95)


Bags


Lowepro Super Trekker backpack

 


Lowepro Nature Trekker backpack

 

Tripod


Velbon El Carmagne 630


I finally got around to buying a carbon fiber tripod back in April, 2006, to replace my heavy, 5 lb 9 oz Bogen 3221 (black version of the very popular 3021). At $290, the Velbon is about as cheap (Feisol being the cheapest) as there is in the carbon fiber genre. It weighs 3 lbs 6 oz. Price wasn't the top priority as I had considered going the Gitzo route, but ultimately, I am not a fan of twist locks at all and I couldn't pull the trigger on one, so the Velbons looked all the more enticing. Plus, they were lighter than an equivalent Gitzo at the time I was looking. It was a no-brainer, and I am happy to report that I really love my El Carmagne 630 and can highly recommend it. I should've made this move years ago.

I just needed a basic tripod that did exactly what my Bogen did, but in carbon fiber to shed a couple of pounds. I don't need the shorter packing height and extra bit of hassle of a four leg section tripod. The flip locks are a treat and the included neoprene grip and pad on the upper legs are nice as well. The 630 sits about 3" shorter than the 3221 at maximum height without the center column extended which is noticeable as I'm pretty much always raising the center column, but that really isn't a big deal most of the time. This is a very well built and solid tripod for photography, though it wouldn't fare as well as my 3221 if I ever had a run-in with a mountain lion where I might need to take a few swings!

My only minor gripes are with the center column and the rubber feet:

The two-piece aluminum center column is split in a very odd place. It's basically an 80/20-split. If you need to shoot low to the ground, you'll have to unscrew the longer piece. It would've been nice if it were dissected a bit more evenly so I could leave the bottom piece off, but with just the top, it only extends a couple of inches, which isn't enough for my 6-foot frame.

As for the rubber feet, they're a harder rubber/plastic material that don't grip as nice as what I'm used to on surfaces such as slickrock, but this really hasn't been a real issue while shooting. I suspect you could remove the OEM ones easily enough and replace them with softer feet, but I've not done this.

I'm such a big fan of this tripod that I also bought the 530 legs. I mainly bought these to shave another half-pound, plus losing some additional girth for hiking and backpacking. While certainly shorter, the weight savings is more than worth it. Plus, it gives me a backup carbon fiber tripod so I don't have to lug around my 3221 as insurance while on a trip. I definitely extend the center column a bit when shooting with this tripod, but it is just as well built as the 630 model, and I really couldn't be much happier with both.

 

Tripod heads

Manfrotto 410
Acratech Ultimate version 1

 

Digital darkroom

CPU: Mac Pro 2.8 GHz (8-core)

35mm film scanner: Nikon Super Coolscan 4000ED

Flatbed scanner: Epson Perfection 4990 Pro

Printer: Epson Stylus Photo 1400